|
|transcripts = |judges = Rose LJ, Hidden J, Buxton J |number of judges = |decision by = Rose LJ |prior actions = |appealed from = Central Criminal Court |appealed to = |subsequent actions = |related actions = |opinions = |keywords = |italic title = }} R v Adams () 2 Cr App R 467, () Crim LR 898, CA and R v Adams () 1 Cr App R 377, The Times, 3 November 1997, CA, are rulings that ousted explicit Bayesian statistics from the reasoning admissible before a jury in DNA cases. ==Facts== A rape victim described her attacker as in his twenties. A suspect, Denis Adams, was arrested and an identity parade was arranged. The woman failed to pick him out, and on being asked if he fitted her description replied in the negative. She had described a man in his twenties and when asked how old Adams looked, she replied about forty. Adams was 37; he had an alibi for the night in question, his girlfriend saying he had spent the night with her. The DNA was the only incriminating evidence heard by the jury, as all the other evidence pointed towards innocence. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Adams」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|